Search for: "Catoe v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Biden Forum, Seema Nanda weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by David Lat
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Its brief highlights how hate speech laws have been weaponized in other countries and even in the United States against "those who simply adhere to and express traditional moral views that are unpopular with those in power. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
” For Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry reiterate the Cato Institute’s argument in its amicus brief in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Josh Blackman
United States – which is used "in service of the constitutional rule" that Congress cannot delegate legislative power to the executive branch. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]