Search for: "Center for Investigative Reporting v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 461 - 480
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Over the past years, there have been a number of investigations and prosecutions of home and personal care aides and agencies. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in Counterman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
State Attorney Generals Increase Scrutiny of Restrictive Covenants A group of 18 attorneys general filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in July 2019 in advance of a series of hearings centered on changes to antitrust and consumer protection enforcement in the 21st century. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
On July 25, 2017, the SEC provided important initial guidance on its views of whether ICOs are securities when it released a Section 21(a) Report of Investigation on its findings regarding the token sale by The DAO (more on the report itself later). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
Should it be shareholder or board centered? [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Department of Justice, who has broader jurisdiction (e.g. federal prosecutors can charge outsider trading as a computer crime or theft) – but no one outside of SEC staff knows for sure. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am
It moved to the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School for a while, and, finally, I ran out of ideas and funding. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Law firms and attorneys, the so-called “gatekeepers” connected to ICOs, have moved front and center on the SEC’s radar. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
We thrive at the center of the edge. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 10:48 am
EEOC, was filed by Democracy Forward in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
