Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 461 - 480 of 14,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
The reasons are many, including the fact that the highest constitutional authority in the land, Supreme Court Justice and leading treatise-writer Joseph Story, insisted that the President did not hold a "civil office under the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:49 am by Claire O. Finkelstein
Yet the United States was not accused of genocide before the ICJ for its operations against ISIS. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:55 am by Beatrice Yahia
The donor countries suspending aid include Australia, Canada, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by Simon Lester
“Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them,” John Marshall, the longest-serving Chief Justice, wrote in 1821. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by Simon Lester
“Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them,” John Marshall, the longest-serving Chief Justice, wrote in 1821. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Ariel Breitman
There are multiple federal financial regulatory agencies involved, in addition to the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice, the Consumer Financial Protection Board, and state authorities. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
First, the Amars assume—without any analysis—the phrases "Officers of the United States" and "Office under the United States" both had the same meaning in 1788 and in 1868. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am by INFORRM
European Court of Human RightsWieder and Guarnieri v. the United KingdomDecision Date: September 12, 2023 The Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the right to respect for private and family life of the Applicants were violated by the United Kingdom in connection with its surveillance practices. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell in the United… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
MILITARY CONFLICT WITH HOUTHIS The United States and United Kingdom imposed sanctions yesterday on four leaders of Yemen’s Houthi militia after repeated attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea in recent weeks. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 8:34 am by The Murray Law Firm
Our firm represents victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $200 million dollars for our Clients. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Josh Blackman
For a different point of view, see Roger Parloff, 'What Justice Scalia Thought About Whether Presidents Are "Officers of the United States",' Lawfare (Jan. 24, 2024, 9:01 AM), <https://lawfaremedia.org/article/what-justice-scalia-thought-about-whether-presidents-are-officers-of-the-united-states>. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:22 am by Delaney Rebernik, HealthLeaders
“This is the first time in our history in the United States of having five generations at work,” says Larry Callahan, MA, chief people officer at Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Health, which has more than 22,300 workers across 16 hospitals and more than 750 care locations throughout the state. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:09 pm by Amy Howe
The Biden administration needed five votes to freeze the 5th Circuit’s order, which means that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett would have joined the court’s three liberal justices in voting to grant relief. [read post]