Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration" Results 461 - 480 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“A Libel Story: Sullivan Then and Now,” Law & Social Inquiry (book review). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Witzke Berry PLLC
These efforts can be defeated by a long-term illness of the parent or the death of a child. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
Posner wrote (on pages 209-10 of Overcoming Law): the University of Chicago Law School, where Strauss teaches, is one block east of the university's School of Social Service Administration, the nation's premier school of social work. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
For example, we are blessed to be living in the golden age of children’s video programming.[8] As I have documented in my ongoing PFF special report on Parental Controls & Online Child Protection[9] and in other filings to the Commission,[10] there’s never been more educational and enriching kids programming available to families than there is today. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
There was also a judgmental decision as to how any such right was to be delivered, as the duty under section 193 was merely to secure that accommodation was available. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
There was also a judgmental decision as to how any such right was to be delivered, as the duty under section 193 was merely to secure that accommodation was available. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 She claimed disability via the Social Security Administration stemming from her diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:52 am by Eric Lipman
The Court held that a Tennessee state court had jurisdiction to hold a disabled veteran in contempt for failing to pay child support, rejecting the argument that only the Veteran's Administration and Social Security Administration could determine what child support payments could be ordered paid from disability benefits, which constituted the father's sole income. 2) Fullilove v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am by Dave
However, social security legislation does not generally permit this type of negotiated compromise. [read post]