Search for: "Circuit City Stores, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
(The Circuit Court also ruled against Arch Wireless, finding a violation of the Stored Communications Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by Daniel Solove
Quon and others sued the City of Ontario and Arch Wireless (which handled the text messaging service) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) and the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
These regulations require that facilities handling or storing a certain volume of oil take specific actions to prepare for and prevent spills. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:44 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The civil suit, which was filed in Baltimore Circuit Court on behalf of Yates' wife, son and daughter, alleges negligence by the driver, Michael Dale Chandler, and his employer, Potts & Callahan Inc., a demolition, excavation and equipment rental company. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
Upland Wings, Inc., of Sullivan, Mo., agreed to the penalty in an administrative consent agreement and final order placed on public notice today in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
An agreement between the company and the EPA was filed Monday in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: City of San Clemente v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:28 pm by Randall Reese
(f/k/a G+G Retail, Inc.)The Rowe Companies (d/b/a Rowe Furniture Corporation)Tweeter Home Entertainment Group, Inc. (2007) (appeals from related utility orders) Buffet Holdings, Inc.Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. (2008)Circuit City Stores, Inc.The most notable among the above-listed utility order appeals as they relate to the present Movie Gallery appeal are The Rowe Companies appeal (also in the Eastern District of Virginia, also involved… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm by admin
UB then failed to properly store both transformers, mark the storage areas with the proper labeling, and failed to mark each transformer with the date it was removed from service. [read post]