Search for: "Clements v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:49 am
Solicitor General Paul Clement, who will be arguing on behalf of the NRA.Stay tuned for the decision on this one as it will affect how states can regulate our right to bear arms.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Panelists are Paul Clement, counsel to the plaintiff States and, Michael Carvin, counsel to plaintiff National Federation of Independent Business. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The new appeal is Gates v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
The request, the NRA noted in its motion, is opposed by the lead parties in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
That case is California Common Cause v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
In one well-known example, DeFunis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
This representation reminded me of a similar colloquy from NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Clement and Theodore B. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:15 am
The case of Peruta v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:35 pm
Clement.) [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
At Time, Adam Cohen takes a look at Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
