Search for: "Coats v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:19 pm
As stated by Gene DeMaio (EVP, Options Regulation Section of FINRA’s Market Regulation Department), CAT has been a “game changer” particularly for option regulation because it provides FINRA with data points not previously available under the COATS reporting regime, and thus, the industry should expect more streamlined and targeted options-related investigations. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:49 pm
" Coy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Today, in Utah v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
” (State v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
As this court explained in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
(See the policy reasoning in Renna v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
In order to produce an image on canvas, a synthetic coating (laminate) is first applied [by Allposters] to a paper poster depicting the chosen work [for which the copyright is managed by Pictoright]. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
., KG v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
More recently Megaupload, the uber-famous peer-to-peer platform, was shut down in 2012 and the United States Department of Justice commenced criminal actions against its owners. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:26 pm
The first of which is Moen Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:42 am
And it was the War on Drugs that led to the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
