Search for: "Cohen v. Cohen" Results 461 - 480 of 3,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Some important facts are proffered late in the case description, but Aybar v Cohen, Placitella & Roth, PC 2018 NY Slip Op 50278(U)  decided on February 28, 2018  Supreme Court, Queens County,  McDonald, J. is a question of jurisdiction and choice-of-law as often comes up in auto accidents in far-off states. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Cohen, plaintiff attempted to use a subsequent case decision to revive a dismissed case via amendment, The attempt failed. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 3:52 am by petrocohen
Cohen heads the Personal Injury Department at Petro Cohen Petro Matarazzo and is one of the founding partners. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 3:52 am by petrocohen
Cohen heads the Personal Injury Department at Petro Cohen Petro Matarazzo and is one of the founding partners. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm
Lee in his place in his decision in Wilson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Phillips Nizer LLP v Scollar  2020 NY Slip Op 30791(U) March 13, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 154972/2017 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen is an example of how the case within a case doctrine is applied to a legal malpractice counterclaim. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Dial Car Inc. v Tuch & Cohen, LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 30407(U) February 10, 2021 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 514138/20 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman the court dismissed. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:34 pm by KC Johnson
Under the Supreme Court's precedent in Brady v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s presumption that there would be a continuation of the retainer agreement she signed with J&S when Schlesinger moved to MLF is insufficient to raise an issue of fact (See Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484,486 [1 st Dept 2018] citing Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008] [“a party cannot create the relationship based on his or her own beliefs or actions”]; Jane St. [read post]