Search for: "Correctional Officer John Doe #1"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
We determine the correct defense strategy based on the facts pertaining to your case. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Trump does not do balance. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Disgorgement does not “simply return[] the defendant to the place he would have occupied had he not broken the law,” the Court held. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 8:15 pm
For forms of privilege that is not historically protected on the basis of class or category, the courts have employed the test originally set out in the 1961 tet by John Henry Wigmore, as described by the Court in R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Stapleton v La Paglia, 207 AD2d 945]Terminating a corrections officer who used excessive force against a prisoner while going to the aid of a fellow officer who has struggling with the inmate. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge John J. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:30 am
Is that correct? [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Under Rule 15(c)(1)(c), "lack of knowledge of a John Doe defendant's name does not constitute a mistake of identity," which means you have to name them before the statute of limitations runs out. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
That is up 1 per cent from last year—I do not make anything particular of that. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
In this sense, Dowd is correct that the president “is the chief law enforcement officer. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:39 am
John Katko (R-N.Y.)? [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:11 am
The Court of Appeals, however, found that this was not the correct analysis. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:53 am
His office was outraged. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am
Correcting the overstatement implies a business tax incidence split roughly 50-50 between capital and labor, more in line with the empirical literature. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:30 am
While it is true that such a tax would be regressive, that does not mean that exemptions are the correct policy choice. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
” from the above — because what does the cited provision of the TMEP say? [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
No. 16-0107 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ---------------------------------------------------------Albert G. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:02 pm
He concludes that Section 1373 is not unconstitutional because it “does not require the forced participation of state officers to “administer or enforce a federal regulatory program,” but “merely precludes a state or local government from ‘prohibit[ing], or in any way restrict[ing], any . . . official’” from sharing information with federal officials. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
IB noted that it, as a direct-access, online brokerage firm, does not provide investment or trading advice. [read post]
