Search for: "Correctional Officer Moore"
Results 461 - 475
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
That is the office which opines for the government on whether actions it wishes to take are legal or not. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:23 pm
After receiving a surge of amicus briefs, considering the original moorings and course of willful infringement jurisprudence, and concluding that it had reached an undesirable place, the Seagate court decided to chart an entirely new course for us. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
" After his return, in 1973, he starts working at the main post office in Chicago. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
Patent and Trademark Office, 11 Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:20 pm
The problem is who we've put in power who holds office. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:21 am
To this day, Lemley and Moore never corrected the false statement they made about Robert Clarke (that's "George" Clarke to readers of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents).In its comments on proposed rules changes on continuing applications, the USPTO cited the wrong page of the Lemley and Moore article.See articles in Kent-JIP andwww.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert2.pdf [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In issuing its order, a divided Court noted that the "unique problem presented by this case is that Moore has not asked for a stay. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
We conclude that the district court's analysis was correct and affirm. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:59 pm
Testifying on the bill were Department of Corrections; and Missouri Corrections Officers Association. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
In this case, while the officers' instincts may have been correct, their judgment was not. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
Julie Moore Walker, et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
[Correction: AB 333 - see Pamela Oehlman below. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
This would certainly appear to be a directive by the second highest federal law enforcement officer in the country to ignore the law of the United States Supreme Court.The last two years in the Sixth Circuit has seen the parallel development of two distinct bodies of law on post-Booker practice that appears to have finally led to some kind of en banc resolution. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
The Federal Circuit: Professor Merges is quite correct that the Federal Circuit case law has sparked great interest by the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 3:08 pm
He claimed that his free exercise rights were violated when prison officials confiscated his kosher food package in retaliation for his filing a citizen's complaint against a correctional officer. [read post]
