Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 31,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
To the study’s credit, however, it does state the following at the end: However, advertisers must also consider call volume needs: it may not be possible for an advertiser to meet its goals by placing ads solely with YP? [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
Tureau Inns of Court, will present a panel discussion commemorating the 75th anniversary of the seminal United States Supreme Court opinion in Powell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
In Azizian v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
Normally, costs don't include fees. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
” Allen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 12:38 pm
On July 28, 2022, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
In Gordon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:44 am
A case still being argued in NY’s highest court (Auqui v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:55 pm
An Appellate Court's Order that Each Side Was to Bear Their Own Costs on Appeal Had No Effect Upon the Right to Contractual Attorney FeesButler-Ripp v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 2:50 pm
The case is: Lowe v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:38 pm
Will strict liability for pit bulls in Maryland cost the state $30 million in state and local tax revenue and cut back rental incomes to the tune of $144 million? [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:38 pm
Will strict liability for pit bulls in Maryland cost the state $30 million in state and local tax revenue and cut back rental incomes to the tune of $144 million? [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
Curious about what state judges make? [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:15 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 12:04 pm
" However the Court of Appeal ordered that the mortgagee pay ninety per cent of the borrower's trial costs and fifty per cent of appeal costs. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:33 am
[2] Zubulake v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:01 pm
United States to resolve a circuit split regarding whether companies could recover costs of internal investigations under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA). [read post]
