Search for: "Council v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
Inter Tribal Council: "Arizona's proof of citizenship requirement is preempted by the federal law requiring that states use the federal voter registration form." [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:03 pm
Contents include:Prosecutor v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 1:01 pm
To view the Court's denial of rehearing of Wolfe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
This, it seems, is the implicit view of the Delaware State Bar Association’s Corporation Law Council (the “Council”) with regard to fee-shifting in shareholder litigation. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10; [2011] WLR (D) 259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who, having… [read post]
Hernandez v Montes, 2018 WL 405977 (E.D. North Carolina, 2018)[Mexico] [Temporary Restraining order]
21 Mar 2018, 5:58 am
Council. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a major church-state case-- Town of Greece v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 1:37 am
R (Green and others) v GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL & SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL [2011] EWHC 2687 (Admin) – Read judgment In the administrative court, the decisions of two local authorities to withdraw funding for library services were held to be unlawful. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 7:53 am
During the meeting, Member States discussed certain issues relating to the scope of the proposed legislation, as well as select provisions under Chapter V (managing of information and communication technology (ICT) third-party risk). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:42 am
Here, as in Valsamaki, there was virtually no evidence of any kind that any such extreme circumstances existed, but rather it appeared that the City was using quick-take proceedings to gain a litigation and negotiating advantage rather than proceeding from and with the requisite justification demanded by the federal and state due process requirements, and the specific language of the statute.The opinion is available in PDF format. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:22 am
The Court rejected Dover District Council’s argument that a breach of the EIA duty alone should be remedied by a mere declaration of the breach due to the specific duty to give reasons under the EIA regulations. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
Employees and retirees covered by a health insurance plan must be advised of changes Orth v Wisconsin State Employees Union Council 24 et al, USCA 7th Circuit, Docket # 07-2778. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:02 am
Employees and retirees covered by a health insurance plan must be advised of changesOrth v Wisconsin State Employees Union Council 24 et al, USCA 7th Circuit, Docket # 07-2778.A collective bargaining agreement between the employer (Council 24 of the Wisconsin State Employees Union) and the union that represented Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Howard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
