Search for: "Cox v. Amend"
Results 461 - 480
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
-> Scope of FOI requests in a competition matter Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
Assume proxy access will resume momentum in 2009 The proxy access debate has clearly taken a back seat to compensation and board oversight issues, particularly with the dismissal of Bebchuk v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Professor Brian Cox handed a petition to Downing Street calling for a public interest defence in defamation cases to protect the science community from spurious litigation. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On Thursday 23 February 2012, Tesla’s libel and malicious falsehood claim against BBC Top Gear was dismissed by Tugendhat J, after an application to amend its original claim (Tesla Motors Ltd & Anor v BBC [2012] EWHC 310 (QB) (23 February 2012). [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
In the Courts On 7 December 2011 Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 3232 (QB), giving the defendant permission to amend, ordering trial by judge alone and refusing an application for trial of a preliminary issue. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:15 am
– Fiona Phillips Law https://t.co/PRuaVTeISy 2018-10-31 ABC v Telegraph Media Group: NDAs and Interim Injunctions, is there ever a public interest in breach of confidence? [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am
The unanimous decision in Maqaleh v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
” Indeed, as a unanimous Court would summarize this holding four months later in Cox v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
I discuss the mechanics of anti-libel injunctions in much more detail elsewhere, and talk there about what First Amendment protections those injunctions have to contain. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(Class 46) No BMW and BMVV for Inter-Tyre wheels (Class 46) New Zealand New Zealand amends Copyright Actto allow photographers to keep right [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In Ostergren v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:00 pm
Press, Forthcoming)- Preprint version- Author = South Africa"Imagining Possible Selves: Perceptions of Education among Young Migrant Women in South Africa," Chapter in Education, Migration and Development: Critical Perspectives in a Moving World (Bloomsbury, Oct. 2022) - Scroll to p. 229.- Author = South Africa(Re)pensando el vínculo entre migración y crisis: Perspectivas desde América Latina y Europa (CALAS & CLASCO, 2021) - Editors (3) =… [read post]
