Search for: "Crawford, Appeal of" Results 461 - 480 of 1,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Orin Kerr
Jan Crawford reports: In the escalating battle between the administration and the judiciary, a federal appeals court apparently is calling the president’s bluff — ordering the Justice Department to answer by Thursday whether the Obama Administration believes that the courts have the right to strike down a federal law, according to a lawyer who was in the courtroom. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:01 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
From this story by Jan Crawford:----------------------------------------------------------------The issue arose when a lawyer for the Justice Department began arguing before the judges. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… Two “timing” cases from the 8th District. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:51 pm
It is this recognition of a criminal defendant's long dormant right to face and cross examine accusers in open court as a colonial response to judicial abuses which the majority in the landmark case of Crawford (referred to as Crawford) asserted was the historical foundation for the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Hankook Ilbo, 2012 ONCA 175 the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal against a jury finding that the words complained of were not defamatory. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Maryland Court of Appeals By a narrow majority, the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
Court of Appeals of Maryland the Court held that state workers may not sue their employers for money for violating the self-care provision of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Russ Bensing
There was one more notable Supreme Court decision, in a disciplinary case, and I’ll take a quick look at that after we check out what’s happened in the courts of appeals over the past two weeks… In State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Tyler Moore
Archie Crawford (Employee) was employed as a lead operator for Island Operating Co., Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
The 11th Circuit reversed Ignasiak’s convictions in January of this year, based on Crawford/Confrontation Clause violations. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
The 11th Circuit reversed Ignasiak’s convictions in January of this year, based on Crawford/Confrontation Clause violations. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner & Ors [2012] EWHC 271 (QB) (17… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:55 am by Dianne Saxe
” The federal and provincial governments have not yet announced whether they will appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
Bowens was convicted of strong-arm robbery, and appealed his conviction because he thought the admission of some surreptitiously recorded conversations violated his constitutional rights (Crawford's right to confront a witness, to be exact). [read post]