Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 461 - 480
of 4,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal has found that Police Scotland breached a journalist’s Article 10 rights when it sought to identify the Sunday Mail’s sources for an investigation into a failed murder inquiry. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:06 pm
Yassin v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
Both the overall figures and the cross-year comparisons are distorted by the number of federal court class action merger objection lawsuit filings, particularly with respect to the years 2017 to 2020. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Dent v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
(D.); VillaromanR. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
Likewise, in R.A.V. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
Clifford v Grosvenor West End, Central London County Court 12 December 2022(?) [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:54 am
In its 1987 Keystone Bituminous Coal v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:09 am
If you didn’t like it in Roe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:44 pm
That procedural issue is similar to one raised last term in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
See Dworkin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceedings are somewhat controversial, and the Supreme Court is now working on its Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Deeb likely crossed a boundary. [read post]
