Search for: "DAVID PHILLIPS V." Results 461 - 480 of 660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Eastgard, Leslie Eby, Phillip J. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” In the news from the lower courts, the Tenth Circuit in Ernest Eugene Phillips v Workman grants habeas relief on a Beck claim. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
At the Canadian Bar Association National Administrative Law and Labour Law Conference, David Phillip Jones in referring to the SCC decision in Agraira, called the implying of reasons “very troubling”. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:12 pm
   The case is Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Social media Another trend we are noticing is the number of defamation claims that relate to social media: Facebook: * Heather Reid v Stan Dukic – $180,000 for “irrational and ranting posts”, ACT. * Kenneth Rothe v David Scott – $150,000 for an accusation of paedophilia, NSW. * Kelly v Levick – $10,000 for an accusation of being a “money crazed bitch” by her husband, Queensland. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:31 am by Peter Margulies
In the US, as David Phillips and Kelly Berkell recently noted, both politics and bureaucratic inertia make lists too “sticky,” hindering the removal of groups when circumstances change. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
 PatLit's David Berry explains the significance of the recent Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in Versata Software v Callidus Software on whether patent infringement proceedings should be stayed pending a post-grant patent review. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
 Over 300 pages make up what then Prime Minister David Cameron described as the most important Bill of the last Parliament. [read post]