Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL" Results 461 - 480 of 43,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm by Michael Geist
  That changed in 2004, when a unanimous Supreme Court strongly affirmed its support for a balanced approach to copyright law and in the process breathed new life into the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision in a case called Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:35 am by LaJuana Davis
A great deal will be written about the future of racial diversity in higher education following yesterday's decision in Schuette v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:18 am by Calvin Massey
   I will be speaking on the panel dealing with the free speech implications of Sorrell. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
Imageview Management Ltd v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63; [2009] WLR (D) 56 “An agent when negotiating with another person on behalf of his principal breached the fiduciary duty which he owed to his principal if at the same time he made with the other person an undisclosed side deal for his own benefit and there [...] [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am by snahmod
Galloway, dealing with legislative prayer and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dealing another blow to Ariad Pharmaceuticals and U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:04 am
Ontario's Court of Appeal released a landmark car accident decision yesterday in the case of Pastore v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 11:33 am by Derek Muller
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:24 pm by Patent Docs
Novo Nordisk and offer counsel tactics for dealing with method-of-use patents. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:17 pm by Howard Knopf
 This is plain and simple “fear dealing” by Brock.It is interesting that the above interview was posted on July 7, 2012 just five days before the SCC decision in Alberta v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:17 pm by Howard Knopf
 This is plain and simple “fear dealing” by Brock.It is interesting that the above interview was posted on July 7, 2012 just five days before the SCC decision in Alberta v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:14 am by artatlawadmin
Like so many court cases dealing with claims to Nazi-looted art, the Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza case has placed much emphasis on the following questions: Which law will the Court apply to the issues it is being asked to consider? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:33 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals published its opinion in Wietzke v. [read post]