Search for: "DNS"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Earlier reports pointed to a form of DNS blocking with substantial collateral damage to hosting sites - is this still the case? [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
; - an injunction telling GoDaddy to change the DNS data for the domain names so the domain names resolve to a site where a copy of the case documents are hosted (servingnotice.com/sdv/index.html); - authorization for Chanel to enter the domain names into “Google’s Webmaster Tools” and cancel any redirection of the domain names; - an order requiring Google, Bing, Yahoo, Facebook, Google+, and Twitter to “de-index and/or remove [the domain names] from any search… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
The trojan seeks other systems on the local network that use the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) and attempts to change their DNS settings, thereby taking control of computers on the LAN that haven't been infected. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:58 am
The letter's 21 signers include Internet Protocol co-inventor Vint Cerf; World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee; Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, public-key cryptography inventors Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman; RSA public-key encryption algorithm co-inventor Ronald Rivest; Paul Vixie, who designed several widely used Domain Name System (DNS) protocol extensions and applications; and security expert and professor Susan Landau, who has fought against government attempts to make… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
All manner of investment into DNS because it’s profitable. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:37 pm
Various DNS lookups are available to a user, though the vast majority of users, in ignorance, simply let their ISP choose the lookup that they use. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
I have preached on this before and my view is: Because of (legitimate) free speech and privacy concerns (and the exploitation thereof), DNS-wide acquisition and WHOIS standards will never be adequate from a consumer protection/brand protection point of view. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:02 pm
Only the government gets the DNS blocking powers. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:27 pm
WikiLeaks expanded from using a single DNS provider to using 14 different DNS providers. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:14 am
Yet the DNS servers were able to withstand the onslaught. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:48 am
The updated language explicitly disavows the idea of redirection, removes a hard five-day deadline for compliance, and (crucially) says that any DNS operator (like your ISP) has fully satisfied its obligations under the statute if it simply fails to respond to DNS queries for blacklisted sites. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The DNS has always served a clear technical function of translating between the alphanumeric names that humans use and the binary Internet addresses that routers use. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:35 pm
One order requires an ISP, Dynadot, to take down all DNS records pertaining to the wikileaks.org site. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 pm
Member after member admitted that they really didn’t have any idea what impact SOPA’s regulatory provisions would have on the DNS, online security, or much of anything else. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
My DNS Filtering Research before House SOPA Panel — Engineer George Ou explains why the main assertions against DNS filtering are generally incorrect. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
In NN, DN and MEN v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 8:34 am
However, ISPs have been applying the blocks via DNS, meaning that users can simply switch DNS providers to regain access to the sites. 3: Battle Over Henry Darger’s Legacy Escalates as Artist’s Estate Sues Landlords Who Saved his Work Finally today, Claire Voon at The Art Newspaper reports that the estate of deceased artist Henry Darger has filed a lawsuit against Darger’s former landlord, claiming that they are exploiting his “unpublished and… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
To help resolve this, you must clear your DNS cache. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
The malware enabled the defendants to digitally hijack internet searches by changing the DNS server settings on victims’ computers to reroute their searches to “rogue DNS servers” controlled and operated by the defendants. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:53 pm
(The last highlights a problem with E-PARASITE and PROTECT IP: if they inadvertently encourage Americans to use foreign DNS providers, they may worsen cybersecurity problems.) [read post]
