Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 461 - 480 of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
There is no need to refer a question on art 1(b) to the CJEU because the law is clear from the CJEU decisions in MIT, GSK and Forsgren that Art 1(b) is to be interpreted narrowly (para 56). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
: Cloud Computing Privacy Under the Stored Communications Act, 98 Geo. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am by Sital Kalantry
”[17] The dissent disagreed with this interpretation and stated that the “general concept of ‘living together’ does not fall directly under any of the rights and [guarantees] . . . within the Convention. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the main request is refused because claim 3 does not fulfil the requirements of A 84. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am by Steve Minor
Reynolds, 260 Va. 98, 103, 530 S.E.2d 902, 904 (2000). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In view of this, the Board does not see that a point of law of fundamental importance arises, that would need a clarification by the EBA. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Under current law, when a business owner dies and transfers the business to an heir, the heir does not incur any additional capital gains tax liability (but does potentially incur estate tax liability). [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 3:01 am by Krzysztof Pacula
If, in fact, as the preliminary question presupposes, a spouse divides his life between two Member States, it has to be considered that he or she does not have a place of habitual residence within the meaning of Article 3 of the Regulation (point 98). [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am by Claire Darwin, Matrix
Redundancy under the 1992 Act has a much wider meaning than it does in the context of individual unfair dismissals. [read post]