Search for: "DOLES v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
  At least one speaker suggested the administration was trying to have it both ways, doling out selected details of its legal case while maintaining a decidedly thin veneer of deniability. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:00 am by SHG
And if so, then it’s in violation of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
And folks this is an ordinary hard working family, not The Sun’s ‘Fat Dole Scroungers’. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  The United States Supreme Court had an opportunity in Bilski v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
This post will be unusually blunt about my disenchantment with the state of our country, a topic I don’t normally discuss on the blog. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (GenericsWeb), Eularis analyses most effective generics defence strategies with new pharmaceutical industry report: (GenericsWeb), WIPO symposium to discuss life sciences multilateral environmental agreements: (Daily Dose of IP), Daiichi Sankyo and Ranbaxy confirm deal is binding and final, allay market rumour and speculation: (SmartBrief), Daiichi Ranbaxy takeover and the implications for the future of IP: (Spicy IP), Europe: Cancer Research Therapeutics’ RNAi patent revoked by EPO:… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm by TDot
For the new folks, I keep the names on these submissions anonymous (picked at random from the Social Security Administration’s Popular Names database) so feel free to send me an email if you’ve got a question but don’t want to risk having your name in print A point politely ignored by nearly every law school nationwide even as they dole out admission to legacy applicants of alums who benefited from segregationist admission policies [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),TomTom, Nokia, face competition concerns: (IP finance)FinlandPGI application for KAINUUN RÖNTTÖNEN for type of pie: (Class 46)FranceBOEUF DE BAZAS to become a PGI for beef: (Class 46)IndiaMore news on the Indian Bayh Dole: (Spicy IP),Bajaj – TVS patent feud – the judgment: (Spicy IP),Copyright and cur [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:22 am by Glenn Reynolds
With more government functions at the state and local level, voters in different regions can agree to disagree. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm by Race to the Bottom
In 2021, current SEC Chair Gary Gensler asserted that the SEC considers crypto as a security under the “Howey Test,” derived from the Supreme Court case, SEC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am by Clerquette LeClerq
They banter about incorporation, and whether the Second Amendment applies to the States. [read post]