Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2018, 10:05 pm
He was named the Stanley V. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:22 am
Times, et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
See Bridewell-Sledge, et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
Nevertheless, there are some admirable works including, very recently, Harvard Business School professor Eugene Soltes’s Why They Do It and Duke professor (and former Enron prosecutor) Sam Buell’s Capital Offenses. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
Farahany, Duke Law School, and Henry T. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:30 am
As part of this ongoing federal lawsuit, known as Curling v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:34 pm
Duke Univ., No. 1:18-cv-00722 (M.D.N.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 5:00 pm
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 350–51 (2011) (quoting Gen. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
Articles DeLeith Duke Gossett, The Client: How States Are Profiting from the Child’s Right to Protection, 48 U. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977) and Griggs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 12:13 pm
In the recent decision of CapStack Nashville 3 LLC, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:42 am
Helfer (Duke Univ. - Law), & Mikael Rask Madsen (Univ. of Copenhagen - iCourts: Center of Excellence for International Courts) have published International Court Authority (Oxford Univ. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
Duke Power (1971) and its progeny). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, which struck down a state law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
In the cases found on Pacer, such as Sheppard et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:38 am
See Martin v. [read post]