Search for: "Davis v. Texas" Results 461 - 480 of 1,038
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm by Amy Howe
Davis, the Court will consider a Texas death row inmate’s claim that the lawyer who represented him at trial violated his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel when he presented expert testimony from a psychologist, who told the jury that Buck was more likely to be dangerous in the future because he is black. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage focused on the decision and the 2016 presidential campaign comes from Alan Rappeport of The New York Times, Nolan McCaskill and Nick Gass of Politico,and Sarah Ferris of The Hill, while Amber Phillips of The Washington Post interviews Texas state senator Wendy Davis, who filibustered the law for eleven hours in 2013. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:00 pm by Jessica Pieklo
At issue in this case were two provisions of HB 2, a Texas omnibus anti-abortion law passed in 2013 despite vigorous opposition including the “people’s protest” and an eleven-hour filibuster by then Texas state senator Wendy Davis. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm by Gabriel Chin
   As the Court held in University of Texas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm by William K. Berenson
New wrongful death decision raises the bar The Texas Supreme Court answered this question on Friday in Seger v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Of course there is the Davis and Welch Show — that is, the Annual Review of U.S. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:30 am by Richard Hunt, guest blogger
Foster of the San Bernardino Superior Court in California issued a three-page minute order granting summary judgment for the plaintiff in Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]