Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 22,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Danielle Citron
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:24 pm by Dwight Sullivan
United States, No. 09-287, has been distributed for Friday’s conference. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
  Hopefully it is accurate:JAPAN ESTATE AND GIFT TAX TREATYUNITED STATES- JAPAN ESTATE, INHERITANCE, AND GIFT TAX TREATY[Signed 4/16/54]ARTICLE I(1) The taxes referred to in the present convention are:  (a) In the case of the United States of America: The Federal estate and gift taxes. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:38 am by Conor McEvily
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: NIBCO, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: S&M Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm by Christopher Mathews
The defense and prosecution have now rested their sentencing cases in the Lakin court-martial. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am by Robert Kraft
Today is, of course, Veterans Day in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:23 pm
  By contrast, doing things even a single day late can kill you.Stay diligent, my friends. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:05 pm
This Wednesday is the day that the Fifth Circuit will listen to arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
” The government could make this showing only by pointing to historical regulations analogous to the regulation under review.Now, in United States v. [read post]