Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 461 - 480 of 38,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2017, 3:14 am by artatlawadmin
Like so many court cases dealing with claims to Nazi-looted art, the Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza case has placed much emphasis on the following questions: Which law will the Court apply to the issues it is being asked to consider? [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:14 am by artatlawadmin
Like so many court cases dealing with claims to Nazi-looted art, the Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza case has placed much emphasis on the following questions: Which law will the Court apply to the issues it is being asked to consider? [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:58 pm by Gene Pierson
Another fun case dealing with Alice Corp. and 35 USC 101 This is case that deals with 35 USC 101, where the judge relied on Alice Corp to invalidate all of the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:52 am
  First, computerizing something that is known to be done without a computer is obvious - the Supreme Court addressed this 30 years ago in Dann v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 7:49 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The case also deals with the calculation of the Investment Multiple which forms an integral part of the Production Sharing Contract. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:46 pm by CivPro Blogger
Jack Balkin (Yale) has a post entitled Erie Railroad v. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 9:01 am
Last week Verizon and YouTube announced a deal that will allow Verizon V-Cast subscribers to stream YouTube videos to their mobile phones: YouTube in deal with Verizon: "Only pre-selected high-quality videos will be available for viewing on Verizon's YouTube channel.... [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
We need political agreement on the outline of a deal in Copenhagen to ensure that specific mitigation and adaptation actions can be swiftly implemented as of 2010. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:53 pm by Scott McKeown
 New issues include prior sales under Helsinn v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:46 am
The case of White v Withers LLP & Anor [2008] EWHC 2821 (QB) deals with that all too common scenario where one spouse takes documents belonging to the other spouse, for possible use in ancillary relief proceedings. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 3:00 am by Ann Lipton
Delaware gives corporate directors a great deal of leeway ex ante... [read post]