Search for: "Decisive Media, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 4,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2022, 3:45 am by jonathanturley
For shareholders, these decisions raise questions of whether corporate executives are serving their interests in joining an effective boycott against Twitter. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm by Arianna Morseau
Michigan Indian Legal Services, Inc RFP Call for Artists. [read post]
Google, Inc., a case from 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit examined whether an individual actor or actress may claim copyright in his or her performance in a motion picture. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Publication BansLa Presse inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:53 am by Klein Moynihan Turco
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of their employer, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm by Arianna Morseau
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
US Dominion, Inc. v Byrne, No. 1:21-cv-02131 (D.D.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Only a year or so earlier, there was media coverage of a post-publication removal of a Monty Python reference in a British Columbia Supreme Court decision after a CBC news story of the sketch-inclusive original decision. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
After the Dobbs decision, each state may establish its own laws on abortion services. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:47 am by David Oxenford
On October 26, NAB and Xperi Inc. jointly filed a Petition for Rulemaking asking the FCC to amend its rules governing in-band/on-channel (“IBOC”) digital audio broadcasting (Xperi is the parent of IBOC technology developer iBiquity). [read post]
Amicus briefs supporting UNC and Harvard Democracy, reliance interests, and legislative purpose The Biden administration urges the court not to overrule Grutter, arguing that the landmark decision “allowed the Nation’s people and their elected representatives to engage in ongoing dialogue about this sensitive and important issue. [read post]