Search for: "Dept. of Children " Results 461 - 480 of 1,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Betkowski, 261 AD2d 829 [4th Dept 1999], after remand 295 AD2d 994 [4th Dept 2002]; Davis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
The decedent’s will had specifically devised the apartment to his two children and first wife, with a direction that it be sold after his death and the proceeds divided among the three of them. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
The decedent’s will had specifically devised the apartment to his two children and first wife, with a direction that it be sold after his death and the proceeds divided among the three of them. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior litigation resulted in an adjudication on the merits (Charles E. v Frank E., 72 AD3d 1439 [3d Dept 2010]). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
The handbills were 8 1/2 by 11 inches with the words “Yasmin’s Little Children Day Care” with her address and phone number. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Co., 88 AD2d 934 [2d Dept 1982], affd 59 NY2d 928 [1983]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior litigation resulted in an adjudication on the merits (Charles E. v Frank E., 72 AD3d 1439 [3d Dept 2010]). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:51 pm by John Hochfelder
Pardo (2d Dept. 2015), the defendant’s arguments as to the threshold were deemed without merit and the $425,000 pain and suffering award was affirmed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
Plus Newell was the most outspoken about abolishing controlled choice-–on the grounds that parents should have complete control over their children. [read post]