Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
Last December marked the 28th anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum, in which the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia provided security commitments to Ukraine in exchange for the latter joining the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear state. [read post]
Federal Judge Suggests Abortion May Be Protected Under 13th Amendment’s Ban on Involuntary Servitude
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
In Robertson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm
In that regard, the closest case I know (and immediately brought up when I commented on the FTC's complaint) is Pistacchio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 3:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Amin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
While FATCA wasn’t created as part of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, it did build upon the goal of deterring financial crime and boosting tax compliance by making it easier for the US government to monitor and investigate foreign financial accounts. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Rosen’s article Deterring Previability Abortions in Texas Through Private Lawsuits was cited in the following article: Jennifer A. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:13 am
Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:05 am
In Holder v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
Presumably the Secretary of State must have had in mind that if a video shows the activity of crossing the Channel to gain illegal entry to the UK in a negative light – thus tending to deter the activity - that cannot amount to counselling (in modern language, encouraging) an offence of entering (or attempting to enter) the UK illegally. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:21 am
See Austin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
The prosecution against him was ultimately dismissed for government misconduct but not because Ellsberg's leak was constitutionally protected.The Court extended the logic of Pentagon Papers thirty years later in Bartnicki v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The FTC can more aggressively enforce the Federal Trade Commission Act and deter the misuse of mobile location and health information. [read post]
