Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 3:14 am
In re User First, Serial No. 87231226 (December 9, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor).Applicant claimed that its specimen of use (shown above) was "the first page of a 103 page pdf instruction manual for the User First platform. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:06 am
When does a design choice rise to the level of being a patentable invention? [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
”[15] Because the law means today what it meant when it was enacted, however, the Little Tucker Act’s statute of limitations simply does not apply to garden-variety suits seeking declaratory or injunctive relief against the enforcement of allegedly unlawful agency rules. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 11:56 pm
This does not of course tell us how many would have moved into work anyway,” My point exactly. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports on Cooper, in which the Court is considering whether the phrase “actual damages” in the Privacy Act of 1974 can include emotional distress that does not give rise to monetary losses. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
But where does it come from? [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:22 am
How does prior art on the web impact the practice? [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:22 am
How does prior art on the web impact the practice? [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
§ 103(a) (Part I); Part 3: 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:17 am
With the scene mostly contained, BNSF does not anticipate the need to offer any additional updates. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:44 pm
The Florida House of Representatives today passed HB 9 by a vote of 103 to 8. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
On January 27, 2017, the German government announced that it had adopted a draft act to abolish the criminal norm, because “providing representatives of foreign states with a legal protection for their honor exceeding the protection already awarded against general personal insults does not seem timely anymore. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:34 am
Because the right to subject corporate stock to levy and sale under execution is purely statutory, a levy which does not comply with the requirements of a state statute is invalid. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:23 am
Polish sausages today. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:05 am
Of course, that does not mean that Family Court will not ever modify custody arrangements. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
The exemption is restricted to advice provided to the client in connection with trading activities permitted under section 8.18 but does not extend to a managed account of a client. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:34 am
So, “if a seller’s regular price is $100, it may not charge credit-card customers $103 and cash customers $100, but if the seller’s regular price is $103, it may charge credit-card customers $103 and cash customers $100. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 7:32 am
The way one used words does not merely describe a thing but it also injects value (and the judgment of principle) into the words used. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:47 am
In 2009, that number was 116 and in 2010 it was 103. [read post]
