Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 461 - 480 of 8,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 5:58 am
April 20, 2010)*: The “so lacking” test is less demanding than the “substantial basis” test for determining the existence of probable cause so the mere lack of probable cause does not preclude the application of the good faith rule. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:33 am
The State does not argue that Bradley had reasonable and articulable suspicion to extend the stop. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am by Matthew Hill
The BBC had made submissions on this point, based on the case of Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd [1982] 1 QB 1. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
I would guesstimate (and NORML confirms) that at least 1/2 of the possession cases involve defendants under 25. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
Smith, 02-1842, p. 1 (La. 9/20/02), 827 So. 2d 1122, 1123 (per curiam); State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
"  That role, as the Federal Defenders point out, includes two components: (1) reliance on empirical evidence of pre-guidelines sentencing practice, and (2) review and revision in light of judicial decisions, sentencing data, and comments from participants and experts in the field. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 5:32 am
The gunsellers have no reasonable expectation of privacy, so it follows that the buyer does not either. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
The post Quick Links From the Past Year, Part 1 (CCPA and Privacy) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]