Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 461 - 480 of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm by Gideon
why does my co-defendant not have the same court date as me: because he’s snitchin’ on you. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
As an example, more than 50% of the loans pooled into Trust 2007-4 were loans with interest rates in excess of 5 percentage points over LIBOR, presumably representing loans of borrowers of low creditworthiness. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm by mjpetro
  The three defendants pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute more than 50 grams of mixtures containing cocaine base. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:59 pm
"  He concluded, however, that "[he] was required to impose two consecutive 25-year minimum sentences on defendant, because on its face subsection 924(c)(1)(A) only exempts a defendant from the application of the 5, 7, or 10 year mandatory minimums set forth in that subsection and does not speak to the question of consecutive sentences under subsection 924(c)(1)(C). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by The Legal Blog
The website of Defendant No. 1 was launched in India as well as in Los Angeles. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
" … Plaintiff brings this complaint … [based on] (1) a blog entry written by Kevin P.] [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
" … Plaintiff brings this complaint … [based on] (1) a blog entry written by Kevin P.] [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:38 pm by John Jascob
But the provision does not apply to the adverse impact on a borrower’s credit that is not related to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Hopkins
This was a case involving a 50 year smoker who died of lung cancer. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Hopkins
This was a case involving a 50 year smoker who died of lung cancer. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The continuous representation doctrine does not contemplate such intermittent representation (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 9; Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Loft Corp. v Porco, 283 AD2d 556). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The continuous representation doctrine does not contemplate such intermittent representation (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 9; Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Loft Corp. v Porco, 283 AD2d 556). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
  Here’s what you need to know:  The defense of selective prosecution must be raised in a pretrial motion, and the defendant bears a “heavy burden” of making a prima facie showing that (1) others similarly situated have not been prosecuted, while defendant has, and (2) selection of defendant for prosecution was based on impermissible considerations such as race, religion, or desire to prevent him from exercise of his contitutional… [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Original trend was 50/50 but courts are now trending to not apply Twiqbal. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Following a trial, Supreme Court denied denying defendant’s motion seeking, among other things, attorney’s fees, and granted plaintiff a divorce. [read post]