Search for: "Doe Governmental Entities 1-10" Results 461 - 480 of 783
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm by Jon
Constitutionof the Band Republic    1. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Westboro had announced that it holds religious events every day from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., so the ordinance bans all picketing within 50 feet of the front property line of the church every day from 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Apple claims that it cannot unlock its newer iPhones for law enforcement (such as the iPhone 5c), even when presented with a warrant, because its phones are now engineered in such a way that Apple does not hold the decryption key. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Also unavailing is the City's claim of judicial or governmental immunity. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
So, while the Division does investigateall verified complaints of discrimination filed with its offices, it is clear that many morecomplaints have been filed with third-party advocacy organizations.Among those who participated in the hearings were representatives of:• New Jersey State Bar Association• Garden State Equality16 (GSE)6• New Jersey Family Policy Council (NJFPC)• Lambda Legal17• American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ)• Nati [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  We note that:  1) the sheer magnitude of a cyber-attack exacts a calamitous injury of risk and tumult, far more penetrating than for instance, a financial reporting mishap; and 2) the rising morass of regulatory attention on cyber-attacks has begun to surpass governmental attention on corporate financial reporting. [read post]
  The Court also commented that practitioners have incorrectly interpreted the 2009 Privy Council case of Belize Telecom [2009] UKPC 10 as requiring an implied term to satisfy merely the requirement of “reasonableness”. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 2:54 pm by Lorraine McGowen
Membership Requirements must have knowledge, expertise and at least 10 years of experience in finance, management, law, social sciences, economics or the organization or operation of business or government entities, and at least 3 of whom must possess material knowledge regarding governmental operations of the Commonwealth; may not be a holder of, or advise or represent, any holder of any bonds issued by a government entity of the Commonwealth or hold interests in… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:50 am by SHG
Of the video, maybe 10% is of any consequence, and of that 10%, maybe 1% reveals police misconduct. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
The text message log does not reveal the content of those messages. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, the preclusion of the affidavits does not render inadequate plaintiffs' opposition to the dismissal motions. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am by Bill Marler
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:26 am by Bill Marler
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The SCA generally prohibits disclosure to federal or state governments of certain email messages and metadata, but this prohibition yields to U.S. court orders that meet the following criteria:  “A court order for disclosure . . . shall issue only if the governmental entity [seeking the order] offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contents of a wire or electronic communication, or the records or other… [read post]