Search for: "Doe PL" Results 461 - 480 of 931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2022, 6:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Plaintiffs charge that a federal statute particular to the Tribe, the Judgment Funds Act, PL 99-346, 100 Stat. 674 (1986) (“JFA”), required Interior to intervene in and put a stop to Tribal disenrollment proceedings. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 5:30 am by Gene Takagi
blog.ncrp.org/2010/12/are-ir… GTak: "Tis the Season to Be Stupid" - The financial mistakes people make when giving to charities—and how to avoid them http://on.wsj.com/fUytRm nonprofitlawyer: RT @PBPartnership End of yr donations coming in - what does the law require a tax-exempt org do to acknowledge them? [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 3:58 am by Jon L. Gelman
This database does not contain rates calculated by OSHA for establishments that submitted suspect or unreliable data. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
PL 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 and 2420, 1 USC Chapter 1 and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:49 pm by Suraj Vyas
" MGM is suing victims in an effort to avoid liability.So, how does MGM avoid liability? [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:49 am by Jeremy Saland
If you have ever been arrested for Making Graffiti (New York Penal Law 145.60) or Possession of Graffiti Instruments (New York Penal Law 145.65) in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens or anywhere in New York City, you know that the Graffiti / Vandal Squad detectives are aggressive in their pursuit of alleged offenders. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner admitted running a numbers operation out of the premises, but contended that gambling should not be illegal and in any event does not constitute a public nuisance. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
Is there another means by which evidence can establish this value and therefore the crime of PL 155.40 as opposed to PL 155.35? [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:14 am by Jeremy Saland
.), the crimes you now face are misdemeanor offenses in New York as long as the value of the property stolen does not exceed $1000 (with some exceptions). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:32 am by Jeremy Saland
For example, if you had a conviction for Petit Larceny, PL 155.25, from 2003 and you were now arrested for possessing a gravity knife in violation of Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, PL 265.01, prosecutors could still use your past conviction to enhance your current conviction as permitted by law. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 11:13 pm by Ken
If you can’t sell the text link to us. pls don’t reply me again. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
While courts generally hold that "[a]n attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause for the purposes of the Rule 4(m)," see, e.g., Howard v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:46 am by Bill Marler
  That’s especially true if a person misses time from work and does not receive paid time off. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
Is there another means by which evidence can establish this value and therefore the crime of PL 155.40 as opposed to PL 155.35? [read post]