Search for: "Doe Smith" Results 461 - 480 of 15,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 3:10 pm by Amy Howe
Roberts almost certainly will direct Smith to file a response to Trump’s application. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on the role of disinformation in political campaigning and its impact on voters, arguing it does not have the sway on elections that is often assumed. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:55 am by jonathanturley
Trump does not appear to be necessarily moving ahead legally but he is still prevailing politically in a curious war of attrition. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am by Steven Calabresi
 Donald Trump, however, does get prosecuted for mishandling classified documents. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Katie Hobbs does not have to publicly detail the money flowing to and from her main campaign bank account until January 2026, when she would face reelection. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The statement “Mr Smith is a disgrace”, although evaluative, fails to identify what the remark is about. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The provision does not say a conviction is necessary for disqualification, though some analysts have said a criminal conviction would help ensure that there was due process before anyone would be barred from office. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tom Joscelyn
  Recent revelations of evidence gathered by Special Counsel Jack Smith will also help prove the case. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Beck of the Reed Smith law firm in Philadelphia for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  Before addressing the substance of the argument itself, it’s important to distinguish it from another, more draconian “non-self-execution” argument that no party is making but that has been prominent in some public discussions of the case—namely, that Section 3 does not apply to disqualify anyone from any office absent congressional legislation. [read post]