Search for: "Doe v. Board of Education"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
A teacher [Plaintiff] employed by the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was served with disciplinary charges and specifications pursuant to Education Law §3020-a. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
A teacher [Plaintiff] employed by the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was served with disciplinary charges and specifications pursuant to Education Law §3020-a. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 3:08 pm
What’s wrong with this picture and where does it come from? [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:38 am
Quoting the Pell Doctrine [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222], the Appellate Division said that under the circumstances the penalty of termination “does not shock our sense of fairness. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:30 am
Citing Lackow v Department of Educ. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" Under the circumstances, the Appellate Division opined that "The penalty of termination of petitioner's employment does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" Under the circumstances, the Appellate Division opined that "The penalty of termination of petitioner's employment does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:00 pm
As to the penalty imposed, citing the “Pell” standard, the court said that the “The penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness” (Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In a consent order, a health professional does not admit any allegations in the licensing complaint, but agrees that the board’s disciplinary subcommittee may treat them as true and enter a sanction for violating the Public Health Code. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:30 am
Citing Lackow v Department of Educ. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
" The Commissioner explained that pursuant to its authority under Education Law §2573(1)(a), DOE may discontinue the services of a probationary teacher “at any time and for any reason, unless the teacher establishes that the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith,” citing Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
" The Commissioner explained that pursuant to its authority under Education Law §2573(1)(a), DOE may discontinue the services of a probationary teacher “at any time and for any reason, unless the teacher establishes that the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith,” citing Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:19 am
New York Board of Education, a summary order decided on October 2. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
” Respondent does not object to its admission. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
” Respondent does not object to its admission. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:53 am
See Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:11 pm
Facts: This case (EDMOND v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
That is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
