Search for: "Doe v. United States of America et al" Results 461 - 480 of 595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Thus, we must reweave the torn fabric of rural America with thread strong enough to withstand the inevitable ravages of time. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Charge filed by United Workers of America Local 621; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm by Litwak
Producers Guild of America, Inc., Et Al. (2nd Dist., Div. 5, March 25, 2008) No. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am by Dan Harris
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The Board found, contrary to the Acting Regional Director, that the petitioned-for unit of the Employer's beverage subdepartment employees does not constitute a separate appropriate unit, and that the smallest appropriate unit must include all employees in the Employer's beverage, catering, and restaurant subdepartments. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]