Search for: "Does, 1-13" Results 461 - 480 of 21,715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 5:35 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In response to the Boards preliminary opinion, the proprietor filed a request (auxiliary request 6) by deleting claim 1 of an existing request. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:23 pm
System 2, on the other hand, has a "wildcard exemption," whereas System 1 does not. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
The BTA rejected using the sale price to value the land because the sale occurred more than 24 months before the January 1, 2011 update valuation, and thus was not a “recent”, arm’s length sale according to the BTA. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
The BTA rejected using the sale price to value the land because the sale occurred more than 24 months before the January 1, 2011 update valuation, and thus was not a “recent”, arm’s length sale according to the BTA. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
G 1/10 [13]).Obviously, all the “corrected” requests where then dismissed based on a violation of A 123(3).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
UBS AG, is next scheduled for hearings on July 13, 2009. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
 Article 13(1) does not use the language "generic term" and appears to be broader in scope than Article 3(6). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This does not mean, however, that there was no duty to observe secrecy for this part, and there is no indication that the nature oft he presentation had changed between the projection of page 12 and the projection of page 13 of E6. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:20 am by Steven Koprince
The post The CIO-SP4 RFP Allows Broad Past Performance Information–But Does It Go Too Far? [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]