Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 461 - 480 of 18,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The judgment helpfully walks through the existing case law, including in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Evans v Cig Mon Cymru [2008] 1 WLR 2675, on when an amendment falls to be considered under CPR 17.4 rather than CPR 17.1 ([46]-[52]). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" On January 25, 2022, Judge Moukawsher issued a memorandum of decision disbarring Cunha from the practice of law on the basis that she violated rules 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5, 8.2, 8.4 (3) and 8.4 (4) of the Rules of Profes [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Race to the Bottom
A beneficial owner is classified as one that either: (1) maintains significant control over the reported company, or (2) has a 25% equity ownership interest in the reporting company. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm by HRWatchdog
For exempt employees during emergency conditions, this general rule applies: If an exempt employee does any work in a week, they get paid for the week. [read post]
Thus, one would likely not have a REP of illegal activities while on UW’s network (however, UI does appear to have a greater level of privacy protection). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Under that standard, the First Amendment does not preclude punishment for incitement if it is established that the speech in question was “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and was “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am by Simon Holzer (MLL Legal Ltd.)
Claim 25 refers to a composition according to claims 1 to 15 and an insulin sensitizer selected from 15 groups of compounds to which metformin belongs. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:26 am by Clyde Burleson
The example above is fairly common, but does not take into account any additional charges or enhanced offenses that only add to the skill and experience required to guarantee the best result for you or a loved one. [read post]