Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 461 - 480 of 13,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:10 am
In such circumstances, and in so far as that rebuttable presumption is not rebutted, the act of posting a hyperlink to a work which was illegally placed on the internet constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
The second is Case C-466/12 Svensson, a reference from the Svea hovrätt (the Svea court of appeal is one of the six appellate courts in the Swedish legal system) asking the CJEU to address the following questions: If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC ...? [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
HELD: The Supreme Court unanimously allows the appeal on Issue 1 and dismisses it on Issue 3. [read post]
Tempnology, the Supreme Court, in an 8-1 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, held that a debtor’s rejection of a trademark license under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code does not terminate the licensee’s rights to use the trademark under the agreement. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm by Mary Whisner
Princeton University and Sciences Po Law presented Synesthesia of Law Sept. 29 (evening) to Oct. 1, 2016, at Princeton. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 11:52 am by Ron Friedmann
The post Rethinking How Lawyers Work Post Crisis – 1 appeared first on Prism Legal. [read post]
3 May 2006, 1:09 am
" The court noted that "the Secretary of Labor has promulgated a regulation — 29 C.F.R. [read post]
Does an employer who genuinely believes that its workers are independent contractors and tells them that they are contractors and not employees, only to later find out that it was wrong, violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act)? [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:13 pm
Affirming a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register, the Board found the mark PROGRAMMED PROTEIN to be merely descriptive of "medical research services relating to DNA and gene synthesis. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:19 pm by News Desk
The newest does not name a recalling company. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:41 am by John Day
  The NPDB has a report that lists all of medical malpractice paid claims against all Tennessee health care providers between September 1, 1990 through November 29, 2009, a period one month short of 20 years. [read post]