Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 461 - 480
of 13,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2017, 8:09 am
Clair, Case No: 08-27884 (12/29/2011) where the U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:10 am
In such circumstances, and in so far as that rebuttable presumption is not rebutted, the act of posting a hyperlink to a work which was illegally placed on the internet constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
The second is Case C-466/12 Svensson, a reference from the Svea hovrätt (the Svea court of appeal is one of the six appellate courts in the Swedish legal system) asking the CJEU to address the following questions: If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC ...? [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:18 am
§ 203(s)(1)(A) and 29 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 6:24 am
Nobriga, No. 04-10169 (12-29-06). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am
HELD: The Supreme Court unanimously allows the appeal on Issue 1 and dismisses it on Issue 3. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:08 am
§ 2615(a)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:14 am
Tempnology, the Supreme Court, in an 8-1 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, held that a debtor’s rejection of a trademark license under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code does not terminate the licensee’s rights to use the trademark under the agreement. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:18 pm
June 1, 2022 By Karolina Hird, Kateryna Stepanenko, and Frederick W. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
June 29, 2023), outlawed race-based affirmative action in higher education. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Princeton University and Sciences Po Law presented Synesthesia of Law Sept. 29 (evening) to Oct. 1, 2016, at Princeton. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 11:52 am
The post Rethinking How Lawyers Work Post Crisis – 1 appeared first on Prism Legal. [read post]
3 May 2006, 1:09 am
" The court noted that "the Secretary of Labor has promulgated a regulation — 29 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:15 am
Does an employer who genuinely believes that its workers are independent contractors and tells them that they are contractors and not employees, only to later find out that it was wrong, violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act)? [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:13 pm
Affirming a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register, the Board found the mark PROGRAMMED PROTEIN to be merely descriptive of "medical research services relating to DNA and gene synthesis. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:19 pm
The newest does not name a recalling company. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:41 am
The NPDB has a report that lists all of medical malpractice paid claims against all Tennessee health care providers between September 1, 1990 through November 29, 2009, a period one month short of 20 years. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:11 am
Moreover, taking these factors together does not alter our conclusion. [read post]