Search for: "Does 1 through 20" Results 461 - 480 of 13,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 11:46 am by John
On October 1, 2013, the North Carolina Courts, through S.L. 2013-103, amended the marital property presumptions found in G.S. 50-20(b)(1) to specifically include property acquired as tenants by the entirety. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 11:25 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Payne is an attorney and he has been a pilot for more than 20 years. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
A fair, common-sense reading of the affidavit presents probable cause to believe: 1. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Without IP, can be enforced through contract/termination of agreement, but not much you can do about third parties. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:18 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
EEO-1 respondents must continue to use the July 1st through September 30th workforce snapshot period for the 2016 report. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 1:38 am by Jon L. Gelman
The comment periods end on April 12, 2021.Related ArticlesOSHA: Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety 1/23/21 National Strategy for The COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness 1/22/21 More than half of COVID-19 health care workers at risk for mental health problems 1/20/21 Disability for Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 1/1/21 OSHA Temporary Emergency COVID Standard on the… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
This is Part 1 of a two part series of posts by Shannon Brandao*, an international attorney and China expert and the editor of China Boss. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:02 am by John Jascob
In its request for relief, Eurex explained that Clearstream does not maintain regulatory capital in excess of $1 billion as required and that an FCM holding customer securities denominated in U.S. dollars at Clearstream (outside the U.S.) does not constitute the FCM holding U.S. dollar denominated assets in the U.S. to meet its U.S. dollar obligations. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 [1] The key issues on this appeal come down to two, straightforward questions: Does Canadian common law impose a duty on parties to perform their contractual obligations honestly? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
See information on that here.Revenue Procedure 2020-20 (April 21, 2020)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 9:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Courts have variously put caps at a 10:1 ratio compared to the other damages in the case, but a 2018 case did uphold a 20:1 ratio, recognizing that lighter conduct might not qualify for such a high ratio. [read post]