Search for: "Does 1-25 inclusive"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Rev. 1 (2009)2245Hemphill, C. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:06 pm
Tuesday, May 25, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will host an online event featuring discussion about Mexico’s midterm elections. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm
Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm
Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
July 1, 2010, orig. proceeding). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
In this context, therefore, the "proceeding" does not conclude until the appellate process has concluded. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
Introduction 1. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
It is reusable, and according to Align, inferior to Align’s sleeve.Three problems: (1) Hashtags containing Align’s marks. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
The holding in Williams, that the status quo requirement does not apply in cases where there has been no initial collective bargaining agreement, implies that the interest to be protected by the RLA is the agreement between the parties. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
There were a handful of resolved cases reported: Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:50 am
Table 1. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:42 am
Code §1798.140(o)(1). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Does the defendant's activity fall within the scope of fair use? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Transnat’l L. 827-888 (2017). 25. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
No Private Benefit Provision of 501(c)(3) Museums While § 501(c)(3) does not specifically mention private benefits restrictions,[16] it is found in the Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), which prohibits an organization from operating “for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests. [read post]
CANADA - Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
Assuming that the population of interest constitutes those individuals who committed sex offences in Canada during the period between 1966 and 1974, (1) we have identified at least three ways in which the sample under study appears not to be representative of this wider population.First, it is unclear from where the 351 subjects of this study were drawn. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Using human rights in refugee law – The need to proceed with caution A well-founded fear of being persecuted is a core requirement for a finding of refugee status under the Refugee Convention.[1] Although the Refugee Convention does not define persecution and there is no universally accepted definition,[2] most definitions tend to stress the need for serious harm and link persecution in some way to a violation of human rights. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:48 am
Insured exclusion, on which the carriers also purport to rely to deny coverage, does not preclude coverage for the claim. [read post]
