Search for: "Does 1-82" Results 461 - 480 of 1,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The 2:1 majority judgment of the Court of Appeal found as follows (we’ll come back to the other judgment below): Ground 1 – ‘Ambit of Article 8’ The majority of the Court of Appeal were firm that, as at first instance, the facts of the case did not fall within the scope of Article 8. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Patricia Hughes
Reg. 119/20 does not itself appear in the order of regulations under the EMCPA. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
In announcing the declaration, Premier Doug Ford referred to “a danger of major proportions”, COVID-19 (pursuant to paragraph 7.0.1(3) 1). [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
In addition, the parties stipulated to the admission into evidence of Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 1 through 22, and Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 23 through 25 were admitted into evidence without objection. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The EUIPO examiner refused registration on grounds that the sign applied for would be contrary to ‘accepted principles of morality’ under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.The wording of this absolute ground, which cannot be overcome by, e.g., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am by Shea Denning
Jones, 106 P.3d 1, 6 (Kan. 2005) (asserting that while “[i]t would be overbroad to declare that all PBT[]s are searches [given that some use passive sensor technology to detect the presence of alcohol in an area where a person is breathing normally] . . . the particular PBT used on [the defendant] tested his deep lung breath for chemical analysis and, under Skinner, was a search subject to the strictures of the Fourth Amendment”). [read post]