Search for: "Does 3-100, inclusive"
Results 461 - 480
of 710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am
We are very serious about safety and will not require anyone to report to work in-person until we and you are 100% comfortable. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
After Russia invaded Ukraine, for example, assessments of whether weapons manufacturers were consistent with an ESG investment strategy changed.[2] Whether natural gas or nuclear ranks well on ESG scales differs over time as well.[3] Some of the issues on today’s ESG list historically factored into assessments of the long-term financial value of companies without a special label or a special set of regulatory mandates to spur their inclusion. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
According to a new decision, CEQA does not preclude all agency involvement or that of elected officials. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
As of this writing, OHA has issued written public decisions in fewer than 100 CVE protests, so the precedent under these regulations is still new and evolving. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:01 am
Nameless, or custom, Trojans such as this are widely available online for as little as $100. 2. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Any regulatory changes aimed at addressing the over-inclusive aspect may worsen the under-inclusive aspect, and vice versa. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:38 am
Tuesday, Jan. 25, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.: Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies will host a seminar on inclusive content moderation. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm
There are particular cases that reasonable minds might differ about in concluding whether that specific case does or does not belong on the list. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Wednesday, May 13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.: The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a videoconference on the Cyberspace Solarium Commission report. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 636 So.2d 3 (Fla. 1994) .......................2 Schwab v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
The program has four principal areas of focus: 1) US-China policy, 2) US cybersecurity with an emphasis on better identifying and holding accountable malicious cyber actors, 3) world hotspots and front burner issues, such as the Iran nuclear deal, and 4) the politics of national security and public opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
In this context, therefore, the "proceeding" does not conclude until the appellate process has concluded. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Friday, October 22, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.: The Heritage Foundation will host an event discussing the importance of the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
In addition, the DOE Office of Science would receive $8.8 billion, which would support programs authorized by the CHIPS and Science Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
