Search for: "Donald D" Results 461 - 480 of 5,834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
One can think--and be right--that D probably is guilty of some crime, even though D has not yet been tried for it and would be entitled to a presumption of innocence in a criminal trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 10:23 am by Christopher J. Walker
Young Barring Judicial Review by Laura Dolbow (Vanderbilt Law Review forthcoming) Admin Law and the Crisis of Tax Administration by Brian D. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm by Roger Parloff
Greene had assumed that they’d be staying where they were to hear then-President Donald J. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
 Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) who demanded the disqualification of the 120 House Republicans. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing next week. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:43 am by Seán Binder
They want to use Enrique Tarrio as a scapegoat for Donald Trump and those in power,” Tarrio’s attorney added. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump, alleging he defamed her when he responded to her accusation that he'd sexually assaulted and raped her in the mid-1990s. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:17 am by Gene Takagi
… The settlement agreement came with only a grudging acknowledgment by Fox that it had been wrong in repeatedly airing false statements that backed up President Donald Trump’s bogus claims of election fraud after the 2020 election. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:07 am by Jerry Goldfeder
Just recently Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) was hospitalized for a month. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:16 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in response to Jordan’s alleged “interference” and “obstruction” of Bragg’s ongoing prosecution of former President Donald Trump. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
§ 2254(d): An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim—(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States . . . .As construed by… [read post]