Search for: "Donald Thomas v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas is next with the opinion in Utah v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
Thomas agreed that the court was right to deny review in this case “because it involves unclear, preliminary questions about the proper interpretation of state law. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman studied the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion in Washington v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae State of Indiana: Thomas M. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
After weeks of speculation about potential nominees to the Supreme Court, President Donald Trump today nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
The battle over efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s tax returns reached the Supreme Court in two oral arguments today. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:28 am by Adam Feldman
Thomas also concurred with a death penalty decision and dissented from a decision upholding a challenge to the death penalty in White v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Reflections on African-American/Immigrant Relations Andrew Grant-Thomas, Yusuf Sarfati & Cheryl Staats Transportation and Civil Rights: Thomas W. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump’s lawyers have been arguing before New York’s highest court that the president is immune from a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
But serious constitutional federalists should be opposing Raich, in line with the powerful dissenting opinions by Justice Clarence Thomas and Sandra Day O’Connor, not exploiting it to impose federal prohibition on unwilling states. [read post]