Search for: "Downloader 54" Results 461 - 480 of 717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a revocation appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board (and claim 1 as granted) read (in English translation):Process for recovering clear solutions containing cell contents from biological samples in a high throughput process, comprising the steps of(a) preparing a plurality of protein-containing solutions which contain insoluble ingredients in separate chambers of a multi-chamber filtration unit,(b) removing insoluble ingredients by filtering the solutions through the… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Swiss-type claims are a dying species, but from time to time we still have decisions dealing with them.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Use of an active substance in the form of microcrystals or microgranules comprising a coating that masks their taste and a mixture of excipients, wherein the mixture of excipients comprises one or more disintegrating agents and one or more swelling agents or soluble agents, for the manufacture of a rapidly disintegratable… [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Both the patent proprietor and the opponent filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain the patent in amended form. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This period overlaps the priority date of the impugned patent (November 9, 2004); thus the question of secrecy is relevant for determining whether the control systems of the CSCP belong to the prior art (A 54(2)).The [opponent] argued that the know-how according to Article 2.3 of the agreement referred to the manufacture of the product concerned by the agreement (Vertragsprodukt), i.e. the slabs, and not to the CSCP itself.However, the Board is of the opinion that the obligation of secrecy… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:24 am by Chuck Ramsay
  You will also have to have to bring your vehicle for monthly maintenance appointments so that engine start information can be downloaded into a report format. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:07 pm by Bill Marler
These 55 cases occurred in 54 children and 1 adult, who presented symptoms between 18/01/2022 (week 3) and 25/03/2022 (week 12). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is established board of appeal case law that if a single member of the public, who is not under an obligation to maintain secrecy, has the theoretical possibility to access particular information, this information is considered as being available to the public within the meaning of A 54(2). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, the board notes that A 54(5) does not apply to the present patent (see point [3.1] above). [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Here is another textbook example of a disclaimer that does not fulfil the requirements established in G 1/03.The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the opposed patent.The Board found the (main) request I to lack novelty over document D1 (prior art under A 54(3)(4)), and auxiliary requests II and III not to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
United Sates, 437 U.S. 54, 69-70 (1978) (quoting United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
He downloaded 12 images from the `Mar’ folder and a movie from a folder labeled `Girlvids. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  Legal research apps are popular, and the "most-often mentioned product names for downloaded legal-specific smartphone apps are Fastcase (25%), Westlaw (11%) and Lexis (9%). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:40 pm
§ § 101, 106, 501-505, by illegally downloading and distributing the recordings via the online peer-to-peer file sharing application known as Kazaa. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:47 pm
Simpson, 54 M.J. 281, 284 (C.A.A.F. 2000)).ACCA then proceeds to badly mangle the first of those prongs. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:13 am
You people are wasting your time.Georgia has 14,407 registered sex offenders- Did you download the file? [read post]