Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 12,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Ct. 1904, 1912 (2000) (vacating federal arson conviction due to insufficient nexus between the alleged criminal activity and interstate commerce); United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, James Glassman takes issue with the Justice Department’s decision to “c[o]me down on the side of the PLO … in [Sokolow v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
The case of Farmer-Paellmann v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 1:10 pm
Washington Ed. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
CBS and Valentine v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:40 am
It appears that jurisdiction under § 1332 does not exist because “Indian tribes are neither foreign states nor citizens of any state. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:18 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Fred Messer v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:19 am
(State v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
In Union Gospel Mission of Yakima, Wash. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:36 am
In short, the statute says it’s a “penalty,” not a tax, and United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
In Currie v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:20 am
Sixth Circuit notes evidence about the defendant's involvement in a prior marijuana transaction may have been admissible under FRE 404(b) to show intent or identity but trial court "fail[ed] to convey that distinct purpose to the jury" in its limiting instruction, resulting in reversal of conspiracy count, in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Per United States v. [read post]
