Search for: "ELENA KAGAN, Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court" Results 461 - 480 of 541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm by Paul Caron
The White House yesterday released this letter signed by 69 law school deans supporting Elena Kagan's Supreme Court nomination: We are writing in support of Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to become an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
On PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills notes that the United States recently filed a brief in opposition in which it asserted that the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over orders by the Puerto Rico Supreme Court denying discretionary review under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm by David Harlow
  He had a strong belief in the right to counsel, a right (together with the right to avoid self-incrimination) that has recently taken a giant step backwards, courtesy of Justice Kennedy and, yes, Elena Kagan. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Marvin Ammori
And this increased protection would come from judges and Justices (such as a Justice Kagan) striking down congressional and FCC rules on broadcasters.In mocking the scarcity rationale, Elena Kagan was disagreeing with Supreme Court majorities, as no majority has yet voted to abandon the scarcity rationale.Kagan was, however, agreeing with the broadcast lawyers in the room. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:46 am by Anna Christensen
In contrast to past Supreme Court nominees, Elena Kagan seems to have generated relatively little controversy or public attention, Ashby Jones remarks at the WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm by Steve Hall
"In courtrooms across the United States, people of color are dramatically underrepresented on juries as a result of racially biased use of peremptory strikes," the report by the Alabama-based Equal Justice Initiative stated. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am by James Bickford
The Supreme Court beat was lightly trodden this weekend. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Jonathan Chait bemoans the current state of the Supreme Court nomination and confirmation process at the New Republic, describing Kagan as embodying the “state-of-the-art modern Supreme Court nominee” – a young candidate with no record of legal opinions but with strong connections to the establishment of the party in power. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
  C-SPAN posts video of recent testimony by Justices Scalia and Breyer on the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
  Well, the Supremes have recently spoken.As reported by the Associated Press:The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a Texas mother illegally moved her son from Chile to the United States during a custody dispute with the boy's British father in the first test of the boundaries of an international child custody treaty.The high court ruled that the Hague Convention on child abduction — aimed at preventing a parent from … [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan continues her meetings with senators, visiting yesterday with Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:13 am by Anna Christensen
” Tony Mauro notes, in a piece at the National Law Journal, that speculation has already begun about who will replace Elena Kagan as Solicitor General if she is in fact confirmed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:19 am by Erik Gerding
Now that Elena Kagan has been nominated to the Supreme Court, the preparations for the hearings begins. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am by Adam Schlossman
  Concurring Opinions addresses Kagan’s scholarly record as well, arguing that, although it may be “modest,” it is “simply irrelevant to the question of her qualifications to serve as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]