Search for: "Ebert"
Results 461 - 480
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
As Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert would say at the end of their reviews, this program merits "Two thumbs up"! [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:27 pm
Care needs to be used in interpreting this result, however, since the very fact that they were not present in large numbers may make it statistically difficult to analyze their behavior.Read/download the paper here (link)See additional coverage by Lawrence Ebert at IPBiz (link) [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:20 pm
House Passage of Major Mortgage Foreclosure Crisis Relief Praised by National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy AttorneysWASHINGTON, March 5 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following statement was issued today on behalf of the 3,500-member National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA) by bankruptcy attorney and NACBA president Carey Ebert of Fort Worth, TX:"We salute the House of Representatives for putting U.S. homeowners and the economic recovery first by enacting… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:28 pm
Late last year, Roger Ebert had an intriguing post on his blog that started like this:It hardly ever happens this way. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:36 am
Roger Ebert's tribute to Gene Siskel is a model of grace and generosity. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
As the court stated:"The Court is mindful that "[I]n a school disciplinary proceeding, evidence may consistof hearsay and reasonable inferences drawn will be sustained if the record supports theinference" (see Matter of Ebert v Yeshiva University, 28 AD3d 3 15, 3 16 [2006], citingMatter of Board of Education District v Commissioner of Education, 9 1 NY2d 133, supra). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:51 pm
Roger Ebert-Review of Police Academy 1 in 1984 [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:48 am
Notably, the film critique Ebert liked the film and noted the way the copyrights were being used to prevent the film from being distributed and that this likewise limited the public's knowledge of the music.Second: So what's the problem? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 11:06 am
Ebert, The Impact of World War I on Present Day Patent Issues, Intellectual Property Today, p. 35 (February, 2005)-->Robert Noyce and Jean Hoerni had been working merely on an idea about putting a flat plane of silicon dioxide on top of silicon, but patent attorney John Ralls kept asking "What else can you do with this idea? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Ebert and J. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 7:56 am
by Lawrence Ebert, to which I posted the comment below:The prospect of another company (or organization) entering the "patent pooling" business is not unexpected. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:24 am
Lawrence Ebert (of IPBiz fame) draws lessons from the patenting and licensing of the transistor -- click here to read the article; Vangelis Economou argues that a covenant not to sue should not destroy a court's declaratory judgment jurisdiction over a patent defendant's invalidity and inequitable conduct counterclaims and that the Federal Circuit should overturn its Super Sack decision -- click here to read the article; … [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 1:48 pm
UPDATE: Reader Debbie Eberts writes: Glenn, I've read Amanda Ripley's book. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Ebert, "Foreseeability and the Transistor," Intellectual Property Today, p. 41 (Oct. 2004). [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:22 pm
On May 14, 2006, another blog [PHOSITA] noted:Well, kudos to Lawrence Ebert at the IPBiz blog who spent some time talking about patent trolls in a recent blog post. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 8:21 am
For that you should probably be reading Lawrence Ebert, Duncan Bucknell, Dennis Crouch, Stephen Nipper, Peter Zura, Doug Sorocco and/or the patent docs. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
I'm a big fan of Roger Ebert, but I'm afraid he's made a bit of a boner. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:35 pm
Bleh! [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 2:12 am
Roger Ebert has an instructive review where he explains all the ways in which it could have gone wrong, and didn't.Sofia Copolla, Lost in Translation. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:23 am
(Indeed, the movie's depiction of the automaker's behavior launched Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times on a rant against Wall Street, the Bush administration and general capitalist chicanery that reads more like an op-ed piece than a film review.)Director Marc Abraham has said in interviews that he actually sympathized with the automaker a bit in its attempts to deal with Kearns, who by most accounts could be quirky and hard to handle. [read post]
