Search for: "Englander v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 4,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 4:28 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JBol Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Health Protection Agency [2012] EWCA Civ 1 (12 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 21 (QB) (12 January 2012) Fitzpatrick & Ors v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 12 (QB) (11 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SB Corporate Solutions Ltd v Prescott & Anor [2011] EWHC… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Michaelmas Legal Term in England and Wales began a week ago, on Tuesday 1 October 2019. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
Theirs was a prime politicolegal-philosophical struggle of the middle of the last millennium -- a battle over whether the sea/mare was clausum/closed, as England's Selden maintained, or liberum/free, as Holland's Grotius posited. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am by Nicole Huberfeld
HHS, but a defense of the coercion argument just published in the New England Journal of Medicine Online inspired me to address the latter first. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:35 am
That's the title of an editorial in the current issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm
Referring to another leading case, Moore-Bick LJ went on to state that "[a]s OBG v Allan makes clear... the common law draws a sharp distinction between tangible and intangible property [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Finally, Part V compares building green as a moral and as a legal obligation in a world of uncertain possibilities and unintended consequences. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 2:38 am
The High Court in England seems to have made it far easier for a child-abducting parent to prove the defenses of consent and acquiescence in a Hague Convention child abduction case than has previously been the case.In CJ v KJ [2005] EWHC 2998 (Fam), Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
Last Thursday, 31 July, Mr Justice Mann delivered his judgment in Lucasfilm Ltd, Star Wars Production Ltd and Lucasfilm Entertainment Co Ltd v Ainsworth and Shepperton Design Studios Ltd[2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch), a 280-paragraph decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales. [read post]
The Court also held that this preclusive effect could not be "negate[d]" by asserting in the state court a purported "reservation," under England v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]