Search for: "Ex Parte Matter of United States" Results 461 - 480 of 2,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
The appeal related to the defence of illegality (“ex turpi causa non oritur actio”; from a dishonourable cause an action does not arise) in the context of a patent dispute. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:28 am by Florian Mueller
For example, Apple filed an appeal today with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit against a USPTO decision concerning U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:45 am
Ex Parte SudhardjaAppeal 2010-004119; Application No. 11/196,651; Tech. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Nevin to continue his cross examination but limited the subject matter to Mr. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:13 pm
I have been writing about the new set of sanctions directed against Cuba, but as part of a wider pivot toward the Caribbean region and Latin America generally (see here, here, and here).It was only a matter of time before the Cuban State responded. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
This is my selection of the most legally and factually interesting cases from England, Australia and the United States from the past year. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am by Florian Mueller
Depending on the rules applicable to each patent, Google requested either an inter partes (where the requester remains formally involved throughout the process) or an ex parte (where the requester triggers the proceedings without becoming a party to them) reexamination. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:20 am by Bickford Blado & Botros
While many people believe that divorces end with heated court battles, this is actually only true for a small fraction of the divorce cases that unfold in California and throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
Furthermore, it could not be an ex parte matter, because by filing her answer, the wife consented to the Court’s jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm by Florian Mueller
They claim to be "concerned about the potential impact of exclusion orders on 'competitive conditions in the United States' and 'United States consumers' in some cases involving F/RAND-encumbered patents that are essential to a standard, and the conditions under which they may be denied", but they want to keep the door open to SEP-based injunctions. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:48 am by SHG
United States (6th Cir. 2008) (en banc), which impose ripeness and case-or-controversy limitations on the resolution of Fourth Amendment claims. [read post]